Taking a biocultural approach to restoring New Zealand’s biodiversity

  • Chris Jones and Craig Pauling remove eggs from black swan nests as part of a customary harvest and egg removal experiment at Te Waihora (Lake Ellesmere).

    Chris Jones and Craig Pauling remove eggs from black swan nests as part of a customary harvest and egg removal experiment at Te Waihora (Lake Ellesmere).

Researchers are investigating how the application of kaitiakitanga (Māori guardianship) approaches contribute to reversing the decline of New Zealand’s biodiversity, and support the relationship of Māori communities with their environments.

The project is led jointly by Dr Phil Lyver of Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research and Nigel Scott of Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, and directed by the Ngāi Tahu Advisory Committee chaired by David Higgins. The multi-disciplinary research team is providing evidence to support reforms in conservation laws that currently obstruct tangata tiaki (local guardian) roles and aspirations.

It responds to a 2011 report by the Waitangi Tribunal, Ko Aotearoa Tēnei – Report into Claims Concerning New Zealand Law and Policy Affecting Māori Culture and Identity. The report found the current regulatory environment excludes Māori from participating in decisions around issues of vital importance to their culture, such as flora, fauna and the wider environment.

Researchers are aiming to develop a framework that provides the basis for informed and inclusive decision-making about environmental conservation.

Kia mau tonu ki ngā tāonga tapu o ngā Mātua Tūpuna
– Hold fast to the sacred treasures of our ancestors

The team is providing evidence to support increased local decision-making by tangata tiaki in conservation through four key themes:

  • The effect of kaitiakitanga on black swan populations and their habitats will be evaluated. In association, environmental and management factors that affect black swan populations and habitat use will also be assessed (Professor Jason Tylianakis and Mark Herse, University of Canterbury).
  • Opportunities for conservation law reforms that better empower tangata whenua (Māori) will be investigated within the current wildlife and conservation legislation (Professor Jacinta Ruru, University of Otago).
  • Kawa (customs and protocols) and tikanga (customary approaches and guidelines) for managing the environment will be explored with a number of iwi at a national scale (Phil Lyver, Ngāti Toarangatira; Nigel Scott, Ngāi Tahu; Puke Timoti, Tūhoe; Craig Pauling, Ngāi Tahu; Dr Jane Kitson, Ngāi Tahu).
  • Interviews with government representatives, landowners/farmers and tangata whenua involved in waterfowl and wetland management and harvesting will be carried out to understand tangata whenua and interest group attitudes toward kaitiakitanga approaches and practices for managing biodiversity (Dr. Sanna Malinen and Corinne Bataille, University of Canterbury).

Members of the team are also working with kaumātua (elders) and tangata tiaki from the tribal groups of Tuhoe Tuawhenua Trust (Te Urewera) and Ngāti Hauā (Waikato) to understand values and constructs for biocultural restoration of forests and wetlands.

The contributions of indigenous peoples to conservation and environmental management are important globally because they offer alternate perspectives centered on the quality of the relationship between humans and the environment.

They also bring unique approaches to the sustainable use of natural resources.

Indigenous peoples’ cultures are commonly embedded within complex social-ecological systems, with the functions of these intricately woven together.

However, the following things interfere with indigenous peoples’ connections and relationships with nature:

  • suppression of rights and culture by governments 
  • degradation of biodiversity
  • conflict over access to, and use of, natural resources
  • ongoing land-use intensification.

In addition, indigenous people, including tangata whenua, confront ongoing challenges applying their worldviews within biocentric-based conservation management.

Lyver PO, Timoti P, Gormley AM, Jones CJ, Richardson SJ, Tahi BL, Greenhalgh S 2017. Key Māori values strengthen the mapping of forest ecosystems servies. Ecosystem Services 27: 92-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.009

Timoti, P., P. O'B Lyver, R. Matamua, C. J. Jones, and B. L. Tahi. 2017. A representation of a Tuawhenua worldview guides environmental conservation. Ecology and Society 22(4):20.
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09768-220420

Lyver PO, Tylianakis JM, 2017. Indigenous peoples: Conservation paradox. Science 357:142-143. DOI:10.1126/science.aao0780.

Ruru, J., Lyver, P.O’B., Scott, N. and Edmunds, J. 2017. Reversing the decline in NZ’s biodiversity: empowering Maori within reformed conservation law. Policy Quarterly 13(2):65-71.

Sinclair, ARE; RP Pech; J Fryxell; K McCann; AE Byrom; J Savory; J Brashares; A Arthur; PC Catling; MD Triska; M Craig; TJE Sinclair; J McLaren; R Turkington; R Beyers; & W Harrower. 2017. Predicting and assessing progress in the restoration of ecosystems. Conservation Letters: DOI:10.1111/conl.12390

Lyver, P.O’B., Akins, A., Hilary Phipps, H., Kahui, V., Towns, D. and Moller, H. 2016. Key Bio-cultural values to guide Restoration action and planning in New Zealand. Restoration Ecology, 24(3): 314–323. DOI:10.1111/rec.12318.

Norton, D.A., Young, L.M., Byrom, A.E., Clarkson, B.D., Lyver, P.O’B., McGlone, M.S. and Waipara, N.W. 2016. How do we restore New Zealand’s biological heritage by 2050. Ecological Management and Restoration, 17(3): 170–178. DOI: 10.111/emr.12230.

Lyver PO, Jones CJ, Belshaw N, Anderson A, Thompson R, Davis J, 2015. Insights to the functional relationships of Mori harvest practices: Customary use of a burrowing seabird. Journal of Wildlife Management 79:969-977. DOI:10.1002/jwmg.906.

BioHeritage’s role is to break down barriers between organisations and individual scientists by coordinating and focusing the research of top scientists from our 18 Challenge Parties.

This project is led jointly by Challenge Party Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research and Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu. Key research institutes and organisations include University of Canterbury, University of Otago, University of Waikato and Kitson Consulting.

The team consists of 13 scientists and community researchers, two PhD and two MSc students. Eleven of these members are Māori. The research is directed by the Ngāi Tahu Advisory Committee, consisting of David Higgins (Chair), Don Brown, Iaean Cranwell, Cyril Gilroy, John Henry, Jane Kitson, Te Marino Lenihan, Craig Pauling, Makarini Rupene, Khyla Russell, Joe Taurima and Paul Wilson.

The team also works closely with the Tūhoe Tuawhenua TrustNgātiwai and Ngati Hauā. In addition, it has brought together researchers and tangata tiaki from four other tribal entities.

Manaaki Whenua

What's new


« Previous      1      Next »


Petrel in flight. Image - John Hunt
Indigenous peoples: Conservation paradox

17 July 2017 - Whats new

This paper deals with an issue of importance in the NZ context, but is international in its scope. It…

Kereru at Zealandia. Credit - Brendan Doran
Reversing the Decline in New Zealand's Biodiversity: empowering Māori within reformed conservation law

20 June 2017 - Whats new

Present conservation legislation arguably reflects antiquated ideas about the value of tangata whenua in contributing to biodiversity restoration…


« Previous      1      Next »